The first article in this issue of IPR Amicus examines the recent developments around Biological Diversity, focusing on access to biological resources, intellectual property rights based on the Indian biological resources, and the evolving benefit-sharing mechanisms...

The article discusses the draft version 2.0 of the Guidelines for Examination of Computer Related Inventions (‘CRIs’).

The article in this issue of IPR Amicus examines two recent judgments of the Calcutta High Court in appeals, challenging the rejection of patent applications on grounds of non-patentability under Section 3(b).

The article discusses a recent Delhi High Court decision which not only brings into focus the legal standards applied to determine trademark infringement but also explores the boundaries of...

The article in this issue of IPR Amicus discusses a recent judgement of the Madras High Court which has held that a method of supplementing animal feed does not qualify as a method of..

The first article in this issue of IPR Amicus discusses a recent decision of the Delhi High Court in a patent infringement suit between Roche and Natco.

The Delhi High Court recently upheld the Controller’s decision refusing a patent application for not being patentable subject matter as amounting to ‘discovery’ under Section 3(c) of the Indian Patents Act, 1970, and for failing to meet the requirements...

The Single Judge of the Delhi High Court has rejected claims of trademark infringement and refused a plea seeking to restrain Mahindra Last Mile Mobility Ltd. from selling its electric vehicle under the trademark ‘eZEO’.

Patents – Revocation petition is maintainable even if petitioner files statement taking defence of invalidity of suit patent, in an infringement suit filed by patentee – Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court, in two of its recent decisions, demonstrated disparate approaches of assessing patentability of computer related inventions (CRIs) under Section 3(k) of the Patents...